Tulsaletter for *|FNAME|* *|LNAME|*- click here to read this in your web browser...
May 31, 2018 | Vol. 68, No. 10

respond | preferences | login | unsubscribe

In This Issue

Dear PEI Member:

Last week, I attended the annual meeting of the Fuels Institute. If you don’t know much about the Fuels Institute, it’s worth investigating. They consistently generate some of the best research and insight anywhere on the future of vehicles and fuels.

Among the meeting’s highlights were presentations by the three finalists in the Fuels Institute’s 2018 University Case Competition, which PEI helped sponsor. For this year’s competition, the student teams were asked to establish a likely timeline and outlook for the evolution of the light-duty vehicle fueling infrastructure in the U.S. through 2040.

As one of the judges, I had read through and graded all of the teams’ written entries. So, I knew what was coming. Even so, the oral presentations were fascinating. The finalists—from Duke, Johns Hopkins, Cornell, Rice, Carnegie-Mellon and other top-tier schools—reached varied conclusions about what the next 22 years will bring. Without exception, however, each saw a future in which electric vehicles (EVs) and autonomous technology will play an increasingly important role.

They’re right, of course. EVs and autonomous technologies are coming. Only the pace and extent of the penetration in the U.S. remain uncertain. Four news headlines from the past month give a sense of the advances and obstacles in this country:

      May 3: Anheuser-Busch placed an order for 800 hydrogen-electric powered semis from the Nikola Motor Co. as part of an effort to convert its entire long-haul fleet to renewable power by 2025.

      May 16: The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) began an investigation of two recent Tesla EV autopilot crashes.

      May 21: Consumer Reports declined to give Tesla’s much heralded Model 3 its recommendation, citing the vehicle’s unacceptably long stopping distance. Tesla immediately announced that a software fix should solve the problem, and Consumer Reports agreed to a redo.

      May 22: Twelve major auto manufacturers and related trade groups sent the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Transportation (DOT) a letter touting the role EVs could play in helping the nation’s light-duty fleet meet future Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions targets.

The Latest on EVs

New E15, E85 Labeling Requirements Proposed

Comments on RP1700 Close June 15

New PEI Terms and Policies

State News and Updates


Respond to this Newsletter

by e-mail to the editor, Rick Long at rlong@pei.org

or join the discussion in the  Petroleum Equipment Forum

return to top of page

But the story that really caught my attention was a lengthy May 23 Fortune article based on an interview with Mary Barra, the innovative CEO of General Motors (GM).

In the past two years, GM has invested $500 million in the ride-sharing service Lyft; spent $1 billion to buy San Francisco-based autonomous vehicle pioneer Cruise; and purchased Strobe, whose laser systems can accurately discern distances and identify objects.

The article described GM’s new Vehicle Engineering Center as a high-tech wonderland that would rival that of any Silicon Valley company and noted that 40 percent of GM’s employees have been with the company less than five years. So, even as Barra is driving change from above, GM's new generation of workers is leading change from below.

If you want a hint of what GM thinks about the future, this quote from Barra is as good as any: “We’re very proud that we’ve been providing mobility to people for over 100 years. Cars changed the way people lived, where they work, how cities came together. It gave people a freedom that they still love. Well, what came with that? Safety issues, crashes, environmental concerns, and the frustration of congestion. With the new technologies, we’re now equipped to solve those problems.” (emphasis added)

Make no mistake. GM isn’t abandoning internal combustion, liquid-fueled vehicles. Equally important corporate initiatives and investments are focused on improving the efficiencies of those models. GM’s challenge is to simultaneously tend to its core business, which currently accounts for nearly all of the company’s revenue and profits, even as it develops the next-generation technologies with which it will face the future.

Sounds a little like the challenge facing PEI members, doesn’t it?

Today, liquid fuels are everything in our industry. But tomorrow (whenever tomorrow comes), the vehicle and vehicle fueling infrastructure mix will look different. Like GM, your job is to maximize current business while positioning yourself to compete in what will be a very different future.

I think our industry is up to that challenge. Members tell me they are actively diversifying their product lines, entering new markets and adjusting their business models. And at last month’s PEI board of directors meeting, three of the 12 distributor members present said they already have begun installing EV charging station equipment.

The future is coming. The time to plan is now.

Two members of the U.S. House of Representatives, Rep. Austin Scott, R-Ga., and. Rep. Lois Frankel, D-Fla., introduced the Consumer Protection and Fuel Transparency Act of 2018 on May 16. Designed to better educate consumers about the risks of fuel containing more than 10 percent ethanol, the bill would:

  • Increase the size of the required dispenser labels for such fuels from 3.5 x 3 inches to at least 5 x 7 inches.
  • Require that the label include the word “warning,” advise drivers to check their owner’s manual and include pictograms of a boat, lawnmower, chainsaw, motorcycle and snowmobile.
  • Ask the EPA to seek consumer and engine manufacturer input on other best practices for educating consumers about misfueling risks.

According to the bill’s sponsors, 95 percent of recreational boat owners fill up at vehicle fueling stations rather than marinas, but current labels do not provide adequate information on the risks of misfueling.

If enacted into law, the EPA would have 180 days to issue new labeling requirements.

The PEI Tank Removal and Decommissioning Committee is accepting comments through Friday, June 15 on the draft of PEI/RP1700: Recommended Practices for the Closure of Underground Storage Tanks and Shop-Fabricated Aboveground Storage Tanks. Individuals interested in commenting may download the draft and submit comments at www.pei.org/RP1700.

You might have heard about the European Union’s new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that went into effect May 25. To comply with the GDPR and make sure we are protecting the privacy and data for all of our users worldwide, PEI has updated the terms of use, privacy policy and cookie policy for all of our sites to make it easier to understand what types of data we collect and how we use your data.

Please take a moment to review our new policies and ensure that you continue to stay informed on all the PEI member benefits, news, events and discounts that PEI has to offer.

The 2017 Annual Report on California Underground Storage Tank (UST) Leak Prevention is available for download. The 30-page report reveals that 3,023 single-walled USTs and piping systems are in use at 1,222 UST facilities in the state. California law requires permanent closure of all such systems by Dec. 31, 2025. In 2017, California owners, operators and regulators reported 73 new releases from UST systems, the vast majority of which stored petroleum and/or diesel. Of the new releases, 45 were discovered during UST equipment removals or upgrades.
Kentucky. The EPA approved Kentucky’s request that three counties in the northern part of the state (Boone, Campbell and Kenton) no longer be required to sell reformulated gas (RFG). The effective date is July 1, 2018.
Oklahoma.  The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) held a public meeting May 8 to receive comments on the state’s proposal for spending the $21 million Oklahoma will receive under the Volkswagen Environmental Trust Mitigation settlement. Details on the proposed plan can be found here.
Montana. The Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) released its 2017 Tank Autopsy Report. The state reported 43 confirmed petroleum releases in 2017, the highest total in 10 years. Nearly 75 percent of the new releases involved gasoline or diesel, with the remainder attributed to heating oil, waste oil, hydraulic fluid and jet fuel. Only one release was the result of corrosion of underground tank components. More common were dispenser and hanging hardware failures, including nozzles not shutting off or hose fittings becoming detached.

The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection is accepting applications for its Alternative Fuels Incentive Grant Program (AFIGP). The AFIGP grants may be used to purchase and install alternative fuel refueling equipment. The AFIGP defines an alternative fuel as any transportation fuel other than conventional gasoline and diesel. Grant applications will be accepted through December 2018.
Texas. Revisions of the Texas UST regulations were finalized May 18, with an effective date 20 days after official publication. For a summary of key provisions, see the Texas Food & Fuel Association blog.

Jones & Frank
hired Ken Frazier as sales director for the company’s east region. Frazier will be based in the company’s Webster, Massachusetts office. Frazier, who received his bachelor's degree from San Diego State and an MBA from National University, was most recently sales manager for Garsite, a supplier of aviation refueling equipment.

Dover Fueling Solutions announced a partnership with Kingspan to offer AdBlue retail dispensers and storage tanks to retail and commercial markets in Europe under Dover’s Wayne and Tokheim brand.

Seneca Cos. made two appointments in its Waste Solutions division. Chris Stewart was named outside sales representative for the east region. Stewart was previously with Modern Welding, Schwob Energy and Seneca’s Fuel Systems division. Paul Villa is the new operations manager for Seneca Waste Solutions’ Tulsa, Oklahoma, branch. Villa comes to Seneca after 12 years at Matrix Industrial Services.


  • Integrated Petroleum Equipment Co., Plainview, New York (dist)
  • K&W Equipment Co. LLC, Rushville, Indiana (dist)
  • PETROCSA, Veraguas, Panama (dist)
  • Petro Services Ltd., Port Louis, Mauritius (dist)
  • Unicorn Sales & Services Ltd., Nairobi, Kenya (dist)
  • Alltank Solutions SDN BHD, Klang, Malaysia (aff)
  • Douglass Distributing, Sherman, Texas (s&c)
  • Environmental and Fueling Systems LLC, Troy, New York (s&c)
  • Geological Resources Inc., Monroe, North Carolina (s&c)
  • Hunter Pump Islands, Alpena, Michigan (s&c)
  • IOR Petroleum Pty. Ltd., Cannon Hill, Queensland, Australia (s&c)
  • Petroleum Network Solutions, Arlington, Texas (s&c)
  • Petrotech Service, Nuevo, California (s&c)
  • Texoma Corrosion Services Inc., Kilgore, Texas (s&c)


Manage Your Subscription

This newsletter is a member benefit of the Petroleum Equipment Institute intended for *|FNAME|* *|LNAME|*. If you no longer wish to receive the TulsaLetter you can unsubscribe from this list.

PEI® and the PEI mark are registered trademarks
of the Petroleum Equipment Institute.
Copyright © 2018 All rights reserved.

return to top of page

© 2018
Petroleum Equipment Institute
P. O. Box 2380
Tulsa, OK 74101-2380

The TulsaLetter (ISSN 0193-9467) is published two or three times each month by the Petroleum Equipment Institute. Richard C. Long, Editor. Opinions expressed are the opinions of the Editor. Basic circulation confined to PEI members.